Smoke Testing Vs Sanity Testing : Explained with Examples
In this tutorial we are going to learn about the smoke Testing Vs Sanity Testing with examples.
Contents
Smoke Testing Vs Sanity Testing with examples.
Sanity Testing
The goal of sanity testing is to determine that the proposed functionalities are working roughly as expected
Smoke Testing
The purpose of smoke testing is to reject badly performing application so that the QA team does not have to waste time in the installation or testing of a software application.
👪 Join Facebook Our Community - https://scrolltest.com/fb
✅ Automation Community - https://thetestingacademy.com
🐦Follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/itstechmode
📖 Like us on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/scrolltest
🎤 Listen to our Podcast - https://anchor.fm/thetestingacademy
Git for QA Engineers: The Complete Cheat Sheet That Nobody Ever Taught You
The 90-Day SDET Blueprint: From Manual Tester to Modern SDET With a Portfolio That Proves It
Last month I watched a LinkedIn post from Nikhil Sidana rack up
Stop Asking ‘Why Didn’t QA Catch This?’ — Start Asking the Right Question
Contents The Meme That Hit Too Close to Home Julio Cesar Adao,
Why AI-Generated Tests Break at Scale — and How to Architect Playwright Suites That Actually Survive
Your AI just generated 200 Playwright tests. Week one feels great. The
How to Build a QA Agent From Scratch: Jira to LangChain to Playwright to CI/CD
Contents The LinkedIn Post That Made 221 Engineers Rethink QA Automation Libin
Building an Autonomous Testing Agent With Playwright + LLMs: From Scripts to Self-Directed Exploration
Anant Jain, Principal QA Engineer at a Series-C fintech company, dropped a
